Showing posts with label misused. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misused. Show all posts

7 Ways to Secure Your Digital Data, According to Expert Shaun Murphy | Dramel Notes

Posted On // Leave a Comment

Data security and privacy is increasingly difficult to understand. How can we be truly sure that the messages we’re sending don’t fall into the wrong hands, and the photos we upload don’t get misused?

To understand data security loopholes and how we can avoid them, MakeUseOf spoke with Shaun Murphy. Murphy is a former government security consultant and the founder of Sndr, a free messaging and file-sharing app that he claims solve the most common problems with encrypted data and online security.

The Problem With Cryptography and Encrypted Emails

We often hear of how the government is reading our emails and how all our text communication is not secure. The common solution offered is to encrypt your emails. These solutions work as a layer on top of email, in the form of cryptographic plugins. However, it’s usually not a practical solution.

“It puts the onus on your recipients to also have the same plugin, exchange some shared secret code/key to read your messages,” Murphy says. “These layers usually add so much friction in communicating with everyone you already know, that people end up abandoning it altogether.”

Cryptography, however, is hard to develop; it’s hard to convince people to use it; and very hard for companies to give up the ability to data mine all of your messages and data, he adds.

“No one or no entity should have access to private citizen’s messages and data that were not clearly intended for public consumption. And for that we need wide adoption of cryptography services between sender and recipients on everything—email, messaging, social media, file sharing. It’s just too risky to leave this stuff unprotected on servers spread out across the world. That’s where Sndr comes in, by putting all of that in one place.”

The Best Tip to Secure Your Inbox: 2FA

Murphy recommends two-factor authentication (also called 2FA or or 2-step verification) as the best way to first secure your inbox against intruders. 2FA is a double-step security protocol, available for most prominent web services. After you input your password, the service sends a second code, usually via SMS, to ensure it’s really you.

“This is a very strong authentication mechanism since it requires something you know (password) and something you have (mobile device)—typically, someone with malicious intent will not have access to both,” Murphy says. “Authentication is essential to starting to secure your communication. Remember, if someone gets into your email, they can reset ALL other accounts you have via the “reset my password” links on social media and most other websites… scary stuff!”

Use Offline Email Clients, Especially When Travelling

Given how powerful Gmail or Outlook or other web-based email clients are now, you probably don’t have an offline client like Outlook Express or Thunderbird. But that’s a mistake, according to Murphy. There are some benefits to using an offline email client like Thunderbird instead of accessing Gmail or Outlook from your browser.

“Your keystrokes won’t be captured (as some social media giant was caught doing recently) as you type your message,” he says. “You have time to review your messages and content for any sensitive information before it is submitted to some connected service. And you can take your time to make sure you connect to a safe network.”

Murphy especially recommends using offline emails clients when you travel. When you are not using your home or office’s Wi-Fi network, you cannot be sure how secure it is. “I do use offline clients when I’m travelling just for the simple reason that most Wi-Fi access points are not safe even if you use many layers to try to protect it,” Murphy says.

Make Passwords 30 Characters Or More

XKCD’s comic nails the security secret to passwords, Murphy says. The longer and more complex you make it, the harder it is for a computer algorithm to crack it. So he has two golden rules for passwords:

  • The user should be able to remember them (without writing them down).
  • They should be complex enough that a computer can’t easily figure it out.

Complexity can be achieved by special characters, capitalized letters, numbers, etc, Murphy says, offering an example of a really strong password:

Ye8ufrUbruq@n=se

“Well that violates Rule #1: I have to remember that somehow. Forget it, I’ll just write it down or stick in a password remembering program… and that’s not so great for security,” he says. “What if we had a really long password but made it a bit more memorable?” For example:

TodayIsGoing2BeTheBestDayEver!

“The key here is I can remember that, it’s a long passphrase and it is very complex and, to some standards, more secure than the first one just because of the number of characters.”

Attach Important Documents as PDFs or 7-Zip Files

Emails are often used to transmit important files, from tax return information to sensitive photos. Since we’ve already established the security flaws in email, you need to be doubly sure about these documents. So first put them into an encrypted, locked format and then email them, Murphy says.

  • Use a document format like PDF that allows you to encrypt the documents with at least an AES-256 key with a huge password (30+ characters) that will be required to open the file and then, further restrict the end recipient from printing, selecting text, etc. This is good because most people have a PDF viewer.?
  • Use some type of container format that allows for at least AES-256 key and a huge password (30+ characters) encryption of data. 7Zip is a good open-source, encryption program that has shown to be decent at security but not extensively audited. But again, the other person needs to have the software.

After doing one (or both) of those options, you can freely send that file without much worry.

This approach still requires you to send that password to the other person. To be safe, Murphy recommends calling them and saying the password out loud; don’t write it down anywhere. And use the principles of the 30-character password trick to make it memorable and secure.

Security Risks Are Different on PCs and Phones

While our smartphones are slowly replacing our PCs, you can’t treat them as the same type of device when it comes to security practices. The risks are different, and so you need to approach the problem differently. Here’s how Murphy differentiates the risks:

Risks for PCs: A PC is generally set up to allow programs to do whatever they please with the exception of a few hot items (act as a network server, access system or other user files, etc.) Today’s threats on PCs include ransomware—a program that encrypts all of the files you need and forces you to pay them some money to unlock them but the biggie is the silent stuff. Some software programs sit on your computer, crawl the network for juicy stuff and silently transmit those files overseas.

Risks for Phones: A phone’s security issues are generally more restricted than a PC because phones aren’t set up to let programs do whatever they want. However, there are other problems. Phones typically know where you are by the cell phone tower it is connected to, any nearby Wi-Fi, and if you have your GPS module turned on. Downloaded apps may have way too many permissions and might be capturing too much information about you (like accessing your contact list and uploading all of them to a server somewhere).

Murphy’s Tip: Encrypt your phone. On Android you have to explicitly do this in the phone’s settings. The latest iPhones ship this way when you have a password. Here’s how to do it.

Also, the actual technology that makes a cell phone communicate with cell towers is generally a black box that the security community doesn’t have much visibility into the inner workings. Is it capable of remotely controlling your phone, turning it on or activating its camera?

Murphy’s Tip: Use a passphrase for login. A simple 4-digit pin isn’t enough, a 6-digit pin is good, a passphrase is best. And pattern locks are out of the question.

Fingerprint scanners are getting better but they are not a good replacement for passwords. Fingerprints and other biometrics are better suited to replace a username than a password since a password should be something you know. With that said, fingerprint scanners to unlock phones are better than nothing.

Finally, the size of a phone makes it more likely to be stolen. And since it has all your accounts logged in, the thief simply has to reset passwords to lock you out.

Murphy’s Tip: Turn on remote device management. For Apple users, there’s Find My iPhone and for Androids, use the Device Manager. This will let you remotely wipe sensitive data from your device if it is stolen.?

When to Use Google/Facebook Logins for Sites

Several sites ask you to sign in using your social accounts. Should you do it?

“It really depends and how much access the site requests for your information,” Murphy says. “If the site simply wants you to authenticate so you can leave comments, try their services, etc. and they request your identity, that’s probably okay.”

“If they ask for all sorts of permission—post to your network ,send messages on your behalf, access your contacts? Watch out!”

Which Services Should You Use?

At the end of all this, you’re probably wondering which of the many popular services you can use and still be assured of your security. Is Gmail safe? Should you be storing your data on Dropbox? What about security-focussed services?

Murphy doesn’t recommend any current cloud app. The popular, convenient and simple ones lack true privacy and security, he says, while the ones that offer true privacy and security are complex to use and have too much of the aforementioned friction.

So what are Murphy’s recommendations?

For email: “Email is sort of a lost cause. Even if you have the most secure provider, your recipients will always be the weak link.”

For cloud storage: “The best is a server that you control, can lock down at the filesystem level, and ensure each file is encrypted with a unique key per file.”

For office suites: “You can still purchase offline office tools or use open source options. Real-time collaboration takes a hit but some secure/open sourced solutions are starting arrive for that functionality.”

For photos: “I go old school with this, connect to a device in my house, transfer pictures from my device to a long term storage drive (not flash, the data will not survive multiple years without being plugged in) and have an automated program encrypt and upload this information to a server I control. It’s not convenient, but it’s secure, not only from prying eyes but from services that go belly up in a few months, year.”

Ask Shaun!

Got any doubts about your data security? Maybe you have questions about how Sndr can help solve those issues? Fire your questions in the comments, we’ll ask Shaun to weigh in!

[Read more]

What is Encryption, and Why Are People Afraid of It? | Dramel Notes

Posted On // Leave a Comment

With recent acts of terrorism in Paris and Lebanon, news media and government have been using the word “encryption” as if it’s somehow to blame. Nonsense. Encryption is easy to understand, and if you’re not using it, you should be.

Like many technologies, encryption has the potential to be misused, but that does not make it dangerous. And it doesn’t mean that people who use it are dangerous or bad. But since it’s so commonly misunderstood and currently a media boogeyman, a few minutes with How-To Geek will help get you caught up.

What Is Encryption?

While computer scientists, developers, and cryptographers have created far smarter and complex methods for doing so, at its heart, encryption is simply taking some information that makes sense and scrambling it so it become gibberish. Turning it back into real information–video files, images, or simple messages–can only be done by decrypting it back from gibberish using a method called a cipher, usually relying on important piece of information called a key.

Already there are a lot of unusual words being thrown around. If you’ve ever written in a “secret code” when you were a child, you’ve encrypted a sentence. A cipher can be as simple as moving a letter down in the alphabet. For example, if we take the following sentence:

This is really geeky

With this simple encryption, A becomes B, and so on. This becomes:

Uijt jt sfbmmz hfflz

If you want to make it more difficult to understand, you can easily represent letters as numbers, when A is represented by a 1, and Z by 26. With our cipher, we simply add one to our number:

208919 919 1851121225 7551125

And then when we move our letter’s position with our A-becomes-B-method, our encrypted message now looks like this:

2191020 1020 1962131326 8661226

In our example, our method, or cipher, is to change letters to certain numbers and add to that number to encrypt. If we wanted to, we could call our key the actual information that A = 2, Y = 26, and Z = 1.

With a code this simple, sharing keys isn’t necessary as any codebreaker could decipher our code and figure out the message. Thankfully, comparing modern encryption methods to this is like comparing an abacus to an iPad. In theory there are a lot of similarities, but the methods used have years of study and genius applied to making them richer and more challenging to decrypt without the proper keys–that is, by the users who are doing the encrypting. It’s almost impossible to decrypt using brute force methods or by reassembling data back into something that looks useful, so hackers and bad guys look to humans for the weak link in encryption, not the encryption methods themselves.

Why Is the Conversation About Terror Suddenly About Encryption?

It’s no secret that plenty of governments get the willies when they think about strong encryption. Modern computers can encrypt text messaging, images, data files, even whole partitions on hard drives and the operating systems that run them, effectively locking out anyone with the keys needed to decrypt the information on them. These could contain anything, and when it could theoretically be anything, imaginations tend to run wild. They contain stolen nuclear codes, child pornography, all kinds of stolen government secrets… or, more likely, your tax documents, bank transactions, kid’s pictures, and other personal information you don’t want others to have access to.

A lot of attention was recently drawn to the ISIL-associated terrorism suspects using encrypted methods of communication with the popular messaging service WhatsApp. The boogeyman here is strong encryption allows spooky people to communicate about who-knows-what and many prominent government and intelligence officials are taking advantage of the situation, shaping narrative to say “encryption is for bad people, terrorists, and hackers.” Never waste a good crisis, as the saying goes.

Many government powers have approached the Googles and Apples of the world, asking them to create encryption with secret backdoor decryption methods–closed-source methods of encryption that hide something nefarious or have “master keys” to cipher and decrypt anything using that particular method.

The current CEO of Apple, Tim Cook, was quoted as saying “You can’t have a backdoor that’s only for the good guys.” Because, basically, an intentionally engineered flaw like a backdoor encryption method totally weakens the integrity of a technology we use in many aspects of our lives. There’s absolutely no guarantee that simply because something is designed for the “good guys” to use, that “bad guys” won’t figure out how to use it. It goes without saying once this happens, all data using these methods is no longer secure.

Without putting on our tinfoil hats and getting super political, historically, governments have a tendency of being afraid of their people, and do whatever they think they can get away with to maintain control. So, unsurprisingly, the idea of these little informational black boxes created by strong encryption makes them nervous.

It’s probably pretty clear to you faster than you can say “the terrorists have won” putting a backdoor in an infrastructure as basic as encryption would make life for us much worse, since strong encryption standards are used in web browsers, email, banking, credit card transactions, and password storage. Making those less secure for all of us just isn’t a good idea.

How, Why, and Where Should I use Encryption?

Encryption, thankfully, is becoming the default. If you’ve ever noticed that little lock icon in your web browser—congratulations! You’re using encryption to send and receive data from that website. You don’t feel like a bad guy, do you?

Basically, by establishing a secure connection, your computer uses a public key to send scrambled information to the remote system, which it then decodes using a private key (since the public key can be downloaded by anyone, but only decrypted using the private key). Since it can be difficult to ensure that nobody can intercept your messages, emails, or banking data, but encryption can turn your information into gibberish that they can’t use, so your transactions remain safe. Chances are, you’re already doing lots of encrypted message and data transmission and you didn’t even realize it.

Nearly everyone in tech is aware it needs to simply be standard and is pushing the idea of “encryption by default”. Simply because you don’t have anything to hide doesn’t mean you shouldn’t value your privacy, particularly in these days when preventing cybercrime, data theft, and hacking scandals is becoming more and more critical to our safety and financial well-being.

Speaking simply, computers and the Internet have allowed us to open ourselves up and become more vulnerable than ever before to these privacy concerns, and encryption is one of the only methods of keeping yourself safe. Many years ago, if you were speaking to someone face to face and saw nobody around, you could feel reasonably secure that nobody was eavesdropping on you. Now, without encryption, there’s basically no privacy in any kind of communication, at all, ever.

When should a normal user incorporate encryption into their digital life? Certainly, if any of your messaging services or accounts offer HTTPS (HTTP over SSL, an encryption standard) you should opt-in. In this day and age, you shouldn’t even have to opt-in; it should be on by default! If a service does not allow for encrypted connections and it allows you to send any kind of sensitive data (credit card numbers, family members’ names, phone numbers, Social Security numbers, etc.) simply opt not to use that website. But realistically, any modern website with a login will most likely create a secure, encrypted connection.

Should you keep the pictures, documents and other important files on your PC in an encrypted container or disk? Perhaps. You can do this by using encrypted file containers or by locking whole disks using software. Some years back, popular cross-platform encryption software TrueCrypt suddenly and mysteriously asked users to stop using their software, insisting their product was insecure, and shut down all development. In a final message to their users, TrueCrypt urged them to migrate their data to the Microsoft product, Bitlocker, now part of some versions of Windows. TrueCrypt was a standard tool for whole disk encryption, along with other software like bcrypt or Filevault. Whole disk encryption is also possible using BitLocker, or, if you prefer open-source methods, by using LUKS on Linux systems, or the successor to TrueCrypt, VeraCrypt.

You very likely do not need to encrypt the files that are actually on your PC to stop hackers and data thieves from taking them. It is not a bad idea to do so to keep important files in a crypt to keep them out of the hands of other people who may get a chance to use your computer. Encryption doesn’t need to be spooky or dangerous; it can simply be thought of as a digital privacy fence, and a way to keep honest people honest. Simply because you like your neighbors doesn’t mean you always want them to be able to watch you!

The same can be said for all digital messaging services, whether they’re on your phone, tablet, or on your PC. If you’re not using encryption, you have little to no guarantee that your messages aren’t being intercepted by others, nefarious or not. If this matters to you–and perhaps it should matter to all of us–you have an increasing number of options. It is worth noting that some services like iMessage from Apple send encrypted messages by default, but communicate through Apple servers, and they could conceivably be read and stored there.

Encryption is Not the Boogeyman

Hopefully we’ve helped to dispel some of the misinformation surrounding this misunderstood technology. Simply because someone chooses to keep their information private doesn’t mean that they are doing something sinister. Allowing the conversation about encryption to be entirely about terrorism and not about basic privacy and prevention of identity theft is fundamentally bad for all of us. It’s not a thing to be feared or misunderstood, but rather a tool that all of us should use as we see fit, without the stigma of being used only for evil purposes.

If you’re interested in learning more about encryption methods, here are some How-To Geek classics, as well as some software that we recommend to start incorporating encryption into your digital life.

How to Set Up BitLocker Encryption on Windows

3 Alternatives to the Now-Defunct TrueCrypt for Your Encryption Needs

HTG Explains: When Should You Use Encryption?

 

Image Credits: Christiaan Colen, Mark Fischer, Intel Free Press, Sarah (Flickr), Valery Marchive, Walt Jabsco.

[Read more]